Caboolture vs Moodlu, QLD Suburb Comparison

Caboolture for retirees and investment; Moodlu for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CabooltureMoodlu

Overall score

Caboolture

28.8/100

Moodlu

35.2/100

Crime rate

Caboolture

93.7 / 1k

Moodlu

92.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caboolture

63

Moodlu

24

Population

Caboolture

29,534

Moodlu

285

Metric leadCaboolture 4Moodlu 41 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCabooltureMoodlu
Overall score28.8/10035.2/100
Housing (desirability)59.3/10054.8/100
Crime rate93.7 / 1k92.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves16—
Public transport stops82—
Walkability30.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities6324
Green cover13.0%19.2%
Population29,534285
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Caboolture reads as a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby; Moodlu is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Caboolture sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Moodlu is further out with more breathing room.

Caboolture pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Moodlu is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Caboolture generally means more sought-after housing, while Moodlu leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Caboolture, while Moodlu remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons