Overall score
California Gully
38.9/100
North Bendigo
42.1/100
California Gully for families and investment; North Bendigo for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
California Gully
38.9/100
North Bendigo
42.1/100
Crime rate
California Gully
138.8 / 1k
North Bendigo
116.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
California Gully
117
North Bendigo
85
Population
California Gully
4,476
North Bendigo
4,277
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | California Gully | North Bendigo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.9/100 | 42.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 73.2/100 | 62.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 138.8 / 1k | 116.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 24 | 34 |
| Walkability | 36.0/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 117 | 85 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 56 |
| Green cover | 18.9% | 11.6% |
| Population | 4,476 | 4,277 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, California Gully is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and North Bendigo is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote. California Gully sits among greener hillside streets, while North Bendigo keeps a flatter suburban layout.
California Gully tends to lead on housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, while North Bendigo stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.
California Gully suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas North Bendigo is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.