Overall score
Cannington
61.2/100
Wilson
52.9/100
Cannington vs Wilson, WA suburb comparison
Wilson for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CanningtonWilson
Crime rate
Cannington
1716.3 / 1k
Wilson
1798.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cannington
327
Wilson
74
Population
Cannington
6,875
Wilson
6,608
Metric leadCannington 5Wilson 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cannington | Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.2/100 | 52.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 7.7/100 | 31.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 1716.3 / 1k | 1798.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 16 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 37 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 327 | 74 |
| Population | 6,875 | 6,608 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Cannington reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Wilson is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cannington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Wilson is closer to the city centre.
Cannington pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Wilson is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Cannington suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Wilson is the stronger match for retirees and investors.