Cannington vs Wilson, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Cannington | Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.3/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 7.7/100 | 31.4/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 16 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 37 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 327 | 74 |
| Population | 6,875 | 6,608 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesWilson
- Best for familiesCannington
- Best for investmentWilson
- Best for best valueWilson
- Best for best schoolsCannington
Comparison summary
Cannington reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Wilson is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cannington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Wilson is closer to the city centre.
Cannington pulls ahead on schools and education options and walkability, whereas Wilson is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Cannington suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Wilson is the stronger match for retirees and investors.