Overall score
Cannington
52.4/100
Wilson
41.0/100
Cannington for retirees and families; Wilson for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cannington
52.4/100
Wilson
41.0/100
Crime rate
Cannington
73.0 / 1k
Wilson
73.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cannington
529
Wilson
148
Population
Cannington
6,875
Wilson
6,608
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cannington | Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.4/100 | 41.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.6/100 | 47.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 73.0 / 1k | 73.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 16 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 37 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 529 | 148 |
| Green cover | 4.3% | 9.3% |
| Population | 6,875 | 6,608 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Cannington reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Wilson is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cannington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Wilson is closer to the city centre.
Cannington pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Wilson is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wilson, while Cannington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.