Cannonvale vs Sugarloaf, QLD suburb comparison

Cannonvale for schools; Sugarloaf for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CannonvaleSugarloaf

Overall score

Cannonvale

49.3/100

Sugarloaf

30.7/100

Crime rate

Cannonvale

81.8 / 1k

Sugarloaf

45.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cannonvale

126

Sugarloaf

0

Population

Cannonvale

6,596

Sugarloaf

310

Metric leadCannonvale 4Sugarloaf 3across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCannonvaleSugarloaf
Overall score49.3/10030.7/100
Housing (desirability)33.6/10048.1/100
Crime rate81.8 / 1k45.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves6
Walkability26.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1260
Population6,596310
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/106/10

Comparison summary

Cannonvale reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Sugarloaf is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Cannonvale tends to lead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Sugarloaf stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Cannonvale sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Sugarloaf.

Retirees and families may find Cannonvale the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Sugarloaf.

Related comparisons