suburb.guide

Mount Julian vs Sugarloaf, QLD suburb comparison

Mount Julian for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount JulianSugarloaf

Overall score

Mount Julian

30.3/100

Sugarloaf

29.4/100

Crime rate

Mount Julian

45.0 / 1k

Sugarloaf

45.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Julian

5

Sugarloaf

0

Population

Mount Julian

477

Sugarloaf

310

Metric leadMount Julian 5Sugarloaf 11 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount JulianSugarloaf
Overall score30.3/10029.4/100
Housing (desirability)53.9/10048.1/100
Crime rate45.0 / 1k45.0 / 1k
Walkability7.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities50
Population477310
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/106/10

Comparison summary

Mount Julian reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Sugarloaf is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Julian sits among greener hillside streets, while Sugarloaf keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Mount Julian pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Sugarloaf is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Mount Julian, while Sugarloaf remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons