suburb.guide

Riordanvale vs Sugarloaf, QLD suburb comparison

Riordanvale for retirees and families; Sugarloaf for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RiordanvaleSugarloaf

Overall score

Riordanvale

25.5/100

Sugarloaf

29.4/100

Crime rate

Riordanvale

43.5 / 1k

Sugarloaf

45.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Riordanvale

0

Sugarloaf

0

Population

Riordanvale

386

Sugarloaf

310

Metric leadRiordanvale 2Sugarloaf 23 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRiordanvaleSugarloaf
Overall score25.5/10029.4/100
Housing (desirability)24.6/10048.1/100
Crime rate43.5 / 1k45.0 / 1k
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population386310
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/106/10

Comparison summary

Riordanvale is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Sugarloaf is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Riordanvale tends to lead on a larger local community, while Sugarloaf stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Retirees may find Riordanvale the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Sugarloaf.

Related comparisons