Overall score
Canterbury
61.5/100
Glen Iris
66.9/100
Canterbury for investment and schools; Glen Iris for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Canterbury
61.5/100
Glen Iris
66.9/100
Crime rate
Canterbury
39.3 / 1k
Glen Iris
44.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Canterbury
299
Glen Iris
346
Population
Canterbury
7,800
Glen Iris
26,131
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Canterbury | Glen Iris |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.5/100 | 66.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 9.3/100 | 9.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.3 / 1k | 44.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 19 |
| Public transport stops | 41 | 106 |
| Walkability | 75.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 299 | 346 |
| Planning activity | 154 | 323 |
| Population | 7,800 | 26,131 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Canterbury is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Glen Iris is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Canterbury sits closer to the city centre, whereas Glen Iris is in a middle-ring position.
Canterbury tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Glen Iris stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Investors and households prioritising schools may find Canterbury the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Glen Iris.