Overall score
Canterbury
61.5/100
Surrey Hills
67.2/100
Canterbury vs Surrey Hills, VIC suburb comparison
Surrey Hills for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CanterburySurrey Hills
Crime rate
Canterbury
39.3 / 1k
Surrey Hills
38.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Canterbury
299
Surrey Hills
301
Population
Canterbury
7,800
Surrey Hills
13,655
Metric leadCanterbury 3Surrey Hills 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for investmentSurrey Hills
- Best for best valueSurrey Hills
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Canterbury | Surrey Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.5/100 | 67.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 9.3/100 | 18.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.3 / 1k | 38.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 41 | 63 |
| Walkability | 75.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 299 | 301 |
| Planning activity | 154 | 216 |
| Population | 7,800 | 13,655 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Canterbury reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Surrey Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Surrey Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Canterbury keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Canterbury pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Surrey Hills is the better pick for housing affordability and public transport access.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Surrey Hills, while Canterbury remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.