Overall score
Ashburton
65.3/100
Surrey Hills
60.4/100
Ashburton vs Surrey Hills, VIC Suburb Comparison
Ashburton for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AshburtonSurrey Hills
Crime rate
Ashburton
73.7 / 1k
Surrey Hills
40.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ashburton
410
Surrey Hills
333
Population
Ashburton
7,952
Surrey Hills
13,655
Metric leadAshburton 4Surrey Hills 63 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ashburton | Surrey Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.3/100 | 60.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 36.1/100 | 44.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 73.7 / 1k | 40.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 12 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 38 | 63 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 410 | 333 |
| Planning activity | 103 | 216 |
| Green cover | 11.7% | 3.4% |
| Population | 7,952 | 13,655 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Ashburton reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Surrey Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Surrey Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Ashburton keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Ashburton is stronger for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Surrey Hills answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
On balance, investors are more likely to prefer Ashburton, while Surrey Hills remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.