Overall score
Glen Iris
66.9/100
Surrey Hills
67.2/100
Glen Iris for retirees; Surrey Hills for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glen Iris
66.9/100
Surrey Hills
67.2/100
Crime rate
Glen Iris
44.4 / 1k
Surrey Hills
38.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glen Iris
346
Surrey Hills
301
Population
Glen Iris
26,131
Surrey Hills
13,655
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glen Iris | Surrey Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.9/100 | 67.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 9.9/100 | 18.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 44.4 / 1k | 38.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 19 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 106 | 63 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 346 | 301 |
| Planning activity | 323 | 216 |
| Population | 26,131 | 13,655 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Glen Iris reads as a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Surrey Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Surrey Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Glen Iris keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Glen Iris is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Surrey Hills answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Glen Iris if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Surrey Hills for investors and value-focused buyers.