Overall score
Camberwell
70.1/100
Surrey Hills
67.2/100
Surrey Hills for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Camberwell
70.1/100
Surrey Hills
67.2/100
Crime rate
Camberwell
64.6 / 1k
Surrey Hills
38.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camberwell
742
Surrey Hills
301
Population
Camberwell
21,965
Surrey Hills
13,655
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camberwell | Surrey Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 70.1/100 | 67.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 9.0/100 | 18.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.6 / 1k | 38.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 15 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 175 | 63 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 742 | 301 |
| Planning activity | 308 | 216 |
| Population | 21,965 | 13,655 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Camberwell is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Surrey Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Surrey Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Camberwell keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Camberwell is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Surrey Hills answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Neither suburb has a sharp audience split here. The better choice between Camberwell and Surrey Hills comes down to which lifestyle trade-offs matter most to you.