Overall score
Canterbury
61.8/100
Glen Iris
60.7/100
Canterbury for families and schools; Glen Iris for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Canterbury
61.8/100
Glen Iris
60.7/100
Crime rate
Canterbury
39.3 / 1k
Glen Iris
44.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Canterbury
340
Glen Iris
384
Population
Canterbury
7,800
Glen Iris
26,131
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Canterbury | Glen Iris |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.8/100 | 60.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.2/100 | 45.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.3 / 1k | 44.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 19 |
| Public transport stops | 41 | 106 |
| Walkability | 75.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 340 | 384 |
| Planning activity | 154 | 323 |
| Green cover | 6.2% | 8.6% |
| Population | 7,800 | 26,131 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Canterbury is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Glen Iris is a lively metro larger suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Canterbury sits closer to the city centre, whereas Glen Iris is in a middle-ring position.
Canterbury tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, while Glen Iris stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Investors and households prioritising schools may find Canterbury the better fit, while retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Glen Iris.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.