Carnegie vs Caulfield, VIC Suburb Comparison

Carnegie for retirees and families; Caulfield for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CarnegieCaulfield

Overall score

Carnegie

59.4/100

Caulfield

58.4/100

Crime rate

Carnegie

47.8 / 1k

Caulfield

66.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carnegie

430

Caulfield

234

Population

Carnegie

17,909

Caulfield

5,748

Metric leadCarnegie 7Caulfield 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarnegieCaulfield
Overall score59.4/10058.4/100
Housing (desirability)51.8/10044.5/100
Crime rate47.8 / 1k66.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools912
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves5—
Public transport stops7526
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities430234
Planning activity17058
Green cover4.8%0.0%
Population17,9095,748
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Carnegie reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Caulfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Carnegie sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Caulfield is closer to the city centre.

Carnegie pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Caulfield is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, and investors are more likely to prefer Carnegie, while Caulfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons