Caroline Springs vs Taylors Hill, VIC Suburb Comparison

Caroline Springs for retirees and investment; Taylors Hill for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Caroline SpringsTaylors Hill

Overall score

Caroline Springs

53.2/100

Taylors Hill

53.9/100

Crime rate

Caroline Springs

49.4 / 1k

Taylors Hill

32.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caroline Springs

281

Taylors Hill

350

Population

Caroline Springs

24,488

Taylors Hill

15,419

Metric leadCaroline Springs 6Taylors Hill 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaroline SpringsTaylors Hill
Overall score53.2/10053.9/100
Housing (desirability)44.7/10039.0/100
Crime rate49.4 / 1k32.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools88
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves237
Public transport stops8735
Walkability100.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities281350
Planning activity358
Green cover17.4%5.2%
Population24,48815,419
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Caroline Springs reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Taylors Hill is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Caroline Springs pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Taylors Hill is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook.

Caroline Springs suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Taylors Hill is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons