Overall score
Carramar
40.7/100
Fairfield Heights
46.0/100
Carramar for schools; Fairfield Heights for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Carramar
40.7/100
Fairfield Heights
46.0/100
Crime rate
Carramar
116.5 / 1k
Fairfield Heights
66.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Carramar
53
Fairfield Heights
46
Population
Carramar
3,475
Fairfield Heights
8,269
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Carramar | Fairfield Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.7/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.4/100 | 48.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 116.5 / 1k | 66.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 50 | 30 |
| Walkability | 38.0/100 | 72.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 53 | 46 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 3 |
| Population | 3,475 | 8,269 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Carramar is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Fairfield Heights is a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Fairfield Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Carramar keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Carramar pulls ahead on parks and reserves and public transport access, whereas Fairfield Heights is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Carramar if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Fairfield Heights for retirees and families.