Overall score
Fairfield Heights
36.0/100
Wakeley
49.9/100
Fairfield Heights vs Wakeley, NSW Suburb Comparison
Wakeley for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Fairfield HeightsWakeley
Crime rate
Fairfield Heights
66.1 / 1k
Wakeley
24.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fairfield Heights
50
Wakeley
69
Population
Fairfield Heights
8,269
Wakeley
4,893
Metric leadFairfield Heights 1Wakeley 111 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fairfield Heights | Wakeley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.0/100 | 49.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.7/100 | 41.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 66.1 / 1k | 24.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 30 | 43 |
| Walkability | 72.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 50 | 69 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 4 |
| Green cover | 0.9% | 20.4% |
| Population | 8,269 | 4,893 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Fairfield Heights reads as a hillside established suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Wakeley is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Fairfield Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Wakeley keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Fairfield Heights pulls ahead on housing affordability and a larger local community, whereas Wakeley is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
Choose Fairfield Heights if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward Wakeley for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.