Carramar vs Tapping, WA suburb comparison

Tapping for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CarramarTapping

Overall score

Carramar

50.7/100

Tapping

50.4/100

Crime rate

Carramar

1245.0 / 1k

Tapping

964.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carramar

31

Tapping

42

Population

Carramar

7,178

Tapping

9,547

Metric leadCarramar 3Tapping 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarramarTapping
Overall score50.7/10050.4/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate1245.0 / 1k964.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops2331
Walkability74.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities3142
Population7,1789,547
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Carramar is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city, while Tapping is a well-connected metro established suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Carramar sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Tapping is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Carramar is stronger for walkability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Tapping answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Tapping, while Carramar remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons