Overall score
Tapping
40.7/100
Wanneroo
45.7/100
Tapping for families and value; Wanneroo for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Tapping
40.7/100
Wanneroo
45.7/100
Crime rate
Tapping
32.4 / 1k
Wanneroo
32.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Tapping
64
Wanneroo
111
Population
Tapping
9,547
Wanneroo
12,113
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Tapping | Wanneroo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.7/100 | 45.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.9/100 | 52.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 32.4 / 1k | 32.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 26 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 59 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 64 | 111 |
| Green cover | 5.7% | 6.4% |
| Population | 9,547 | 12,113 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 4/10 |
Tapping is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Wanneroo is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Tapping is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Wanneroo answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tapping, while Wanneroo remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.