Tapping vs Wanneroo, WA Suburb Comparison

Tapping for families and value; Wanneroo for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

TappingWanneroo

Overall score

Tapping

40.7/100

Wanneroo

45.7/100

Crime rate

Tapping

32.4 / 1k

Wanneroo

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Tapping

64

Wanneroo

111

Population

Tapping

9,547

Wanneroo

12,113

Metric leadTapping 1Wanneroo 92 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryTappingWanneroo
Overall score40.7/10045.7/100
Housing (desirability)46.9/10052.6/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves426
Public transport stops3159
Walkability32.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities64111
Green cover5.7%6.4%
Population9,54712,113
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/104/10

Comparison summary

Tapping is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Wanneroo is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Tapping is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Wanneroo answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tapping, while Wanneroo remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons