Jandabup vs Wanneroo, WA Suburb Comparison

Wanneroo for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JandabupWanneroo

Overall score

Jandabup

35.1/100

Wanneroo

45.7/100

Crime rate

Jandabup

32.4 / 1k

Wanneroo

32.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jandabup

1

Wanneroo

111

Population

Jandabup

291

Wanneroo

12,113

Metric leadJandabup 1Wanneroo 62 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJandabupWanneroo
Overall score35.1/10045.7/100
Housing (desirability)49.7/10052.6/100
Crime rate32.4 / 1k32.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools—6
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—26
Public transport stops—59
Walkability0.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities1111
Planning activity1—
Green cover2.4%6.4%
Population29112,113
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/104/10

Comparison summary

Jandabup is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Wanneroo is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Jandabup sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Wanneroo is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Jandabup is stronger for stronger socioeconomic advantage; Wanneroo answers with walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability. Jandabup generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Wanneroo leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wanneroo, while Jandabup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons