Carrickalinga vs Yankalilla, SA Suburb Comparison

Carrickalinga for beach lifestyle; Yankalilla for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CarrickalingaYankalilla

Overall score

Carrickalinga

38.8/100

Yankalilla

47.7/100

Crime rate

Carrickalinga

22.0 / 1k

Yankalilla

26.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carrickalinga

6

Yankalilla

35

Population

Carrickalinga

409

Yankalilla

963

Metric leadCarrickalinga 2Yankalilla 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarrickalingaYankalilla
Overall score38.8/10047.7/100
Housing (desirability)42.3/10071.5/100
Crime rate22.0 / 1k26.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops—4
Walkability2.0/10054.0/100
Nearby amenities635
Planning activity3325
Green cover0.4%0.8%
Population409963
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Carrickalinga is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm, and Yankalilla is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace. Carrickalinga leans into coastal living, while Yankalilla feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Carrickalinga is stronger for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Yankalilla answers with housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Carrickalinga sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Yankalilla.

Retirees, families, and people chasing a beach lifestyle may find Carrickalinga the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Yankalilla.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons