Casuarina vs Millner, NT suburb comparison

Casuarina for retirees; Millner for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CasuarinaMillner

Overall score

Casuarina

47.5/100

Millner

50.5/100

Nearby amenities

Casuarina

341

Millner

87

Population

Casuarina

406

Millner

2,576

Metric leadCasuarina 4Millner 4across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCasuarinaMillner
Overall score47.5/10050.5/100
Housing (desirability)0.5/10027.1/100
Schools & preschools137
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops620
Walkability79.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities34187
Population4062,576
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/105/10

Comparison summary

Casuarina is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Millner is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Casuarina tends to lead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Millner stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Casuarina generally means more sought-after housing, while Millner leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Choose Casuarina if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Millner for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons