Cedar Creek vs Kingsholme, QLD suburb comparison

Cedar Creek for investment and value; Kingsholme for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cedar CreekKingsholme

Overall score

Cedar Creek

49.2/100

Kingsholme

40.4/100

Crime rate

Cedar Creek

71.3 / 1k

Kingsholme

20.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cedar Creek

13

Kingsholme

0

Population

Cedar Creek

861

Kingsholme

782

Metric leadCedar Creek 5Kingsholme 21 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCedar CreekKingsholme
Overall score49.2/10040.4/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10076.0/100
Crime rate71.3 / 1k20.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves62
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities130
Population861782
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Cedar Creek is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Kingsholme is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city. Cedar Creek sits among greener hillside streets, while Kingsholme keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Cedar Creek tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Kingsholme stands out for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Cedar Creek generally means more mid-market housing value, while Kingsholme leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Cedar Creek if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Kingsholme for retirees and families.

Related comparisons