Overall score
Kingsholme
47.2/100
Luscombe
28.6/100
Kingsholme for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kingsholme
47.2/100
Luscombe
28.6/100
Crime rate
Kingsholme
34.5 / 1k
Luscombe
118.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kingsholme
2
Luscombe
0
Population
Kingsholme
782
Luscombe
265
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kingsholme | Luscombe |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.2/100 | 28.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.4/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.5 / 1k | 118.8 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 0 |
| Green cover | 4.4% | 0.0% |
| Population | 782 | 265 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Kingsholme is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Luscombe is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
On the data, Kingsholme is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities; Luscombe answers with an affluent, sought-after address.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kingsholme, while Luscombe remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.