Overall score
Centennial Park
57.1/100
Lockyer
40.0/100
Centennial Park vs Lockyer, WA Suburb Comparison
Centennial Park for families and investment; Lockyer for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Centennial ParkLockyer
Crime rate
Centennial Park
53.1 / 1k
Lockyer
53.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Centennial Park
102
Lockyer
9
Population
Centennial Park
689
Lockyer
1,298
Metric leadCentennial Park 4Lockyer 34 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesCentennial Park
- Best for investmentCentennial Park
- Best for best valueLockyer
- Best for best schoolsCentennial Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Centennial Park | Lockyer |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.1/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 69.3/100 | 74.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.1 / 1k | 53.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 8 |
| Walkability | 77.5/100 | 12.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 102 | 9 |
| Green cover | 0.8% | 3.3% |
| Population | 689 | 1,298 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Centennial Park reads as a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Lockyer is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Centennial Park tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Lockyer stands out for housing affordability and a larger local community.
Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Centennial Park the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Lockyer.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.