Centennial Park vs Mount Clarence, WA suburb comparison

Centennial Park for families and investment; Mount Clarence for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Centennial ParkMount Clarence

Overall score

Centennial Park

51.0/100

Mount Clarence

33.6/100

Crime rate

Centennial Park

4855.4 / 1k

Mount Clarence

4591.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Centennial Park

66

Mount Clarence

10

Population

Centennial Park

689

Mount Clarence

728

Metric leadCentennial Park 6Mount Clarence 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCentennial ParkMount Clarence
Overall score51.0/10033.6/100
Housing (desirability)52.8/10048.6/100
Crime rate4855.4 / 1k4591.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools62
Public transport stops134
Walkability77.5/1008.0/100
Nearby amenities6610
Population689728
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Centennial Park is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Mount Clarence is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Where Mount Clarence is shaped by the coast, Centennial Park offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Centennial Park tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Mount Clarence stands out for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community. On housing, Centennial Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Clarence.

Choose Centennial Park if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Clarence for people chasing a beach lifestyle.

Related comparisons