Mount Clarence vs Spencer Park, WA Suburb Comparison

Mount Clarence for families and beach lifestyle; Spencer Park for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount ClarenceSpencer Park

Overall score

Mount Clarence

47.4/100

Spencer Park

55.0/100

Crime rate

Mount Clarence

50.0 / 1k

Spencer Park

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Clarence

37

Spencer Park

34

Population

Mount Clarence

728

Spencer Park

3,445

Metric leadMount Clarence 2Spencer Park 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount ClarenceSpencer Park
Overall score47.4/10055.0/100
Housing (desirability)45.0/10067.6/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools26
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops413
Walkability8.0/10063.5/100
Nearby amenities3734
Green cover1.2%7.2%
Population7283,445
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Clarence is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Mount Clarence leans into coastal living, while Spencer Park feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Mount Clarence is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage; Spencer Park answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.

Mount Clarence suits retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle more clearly, whereas Spencer Park is the stronger match for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons