Overall score
Mount Clarence
33.6/100
Spencer Park
56.1/100
Mount Clarence for retirees and beach lifestyle; Spencer Park for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Clarence
33.6/100
Spencer Park
56.1/100
Crime rate
Mount Clarence
4591.1 / 1k
Spencer Park
970.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Clarence
10
Spencer Park
21
Population
Mount Clarence
728
Spencer Park
3,445
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Clarence | Spencer Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.6/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.6/100 | 49.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 4591.1 / 1k | 970.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 13 |
| Walkability | 8.0/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 10 | 21 |
| Population | 728 | 3,445 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Clarence is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Mount Clarence leans into coastal living, while Spencer Park feels more inland and suburban in character.
On the data, Mount Clarence is stronger for stronger socioeconomic advantage; Spencer Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Mount Clarence generally means more sought-after housing, while Spencer Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Mount Clarence suits people chasing a beach lifestyle more clearly, whereas Spencer Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.