Mount Clarence vs Spencer Park, WA suburb comparison

Mount Clarence for retirees and beach lifestyle; Spencer Park for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount ClarenceSpencer Park

Overall score

Mount Clarence

33.6/100

Spencer Park

56.1/100

Crime rate

Mount Clarence

4591.1 / 1k

Spencer Park

970.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Clarence

10

Spencer Park

21

Population

Mount Clarence

728

Spencer Park

3,445

Metric leadMount Clarence 1Spencer Park 8across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount ClarenceSpencer Park
Overall score33.6/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)48.6/10049.2/100
Crime rate4591.1 / 1k970.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools26
Public transport stops413
Walkability8.0/10063.5/100
Nearby amenities1021
Population7283,445
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Clarence is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Mount Clarence leans into coastal living, while Spencer Park feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Mount Clarence is stronger for stronger socioeconomic advantage; Spencer Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Mount Clarence generally means more sought-after housing, while Spencer Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Mount Clarence suits people chasing a beach lifestyle more clearly, whereas Spencer Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons