Collingwood Heights vs Spencer Park, WA suburb comparison

Collingwood Heights for retirees; Spencer Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Collingwood HeightsSpencer Park

Overall score

Collingwood Heights

32.0/100

Spencer Park

56.1/100

Crime rate

Collingwood Heights

4816.7 / 1k

Spencer Park

970.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Collingwood Heights

3

Spencer Park

21

Population

Collingwood Heights

694

Spencer Park

3,445

Metric leadCollingwood Heights 1Spencer Park 8across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCollingwood HeightsSpencer Park
Overall score32.0/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)37.1/10049.2/100
Crime rate4816.7 / 1k970.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Public transport stops513
Walkability7.5/10063.5/100
Nearby amenities321
Population6943,445
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Collingwood Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Spencer Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Collingwood Heights tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Spencer Park stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Collingwood Heights generally means more sought-after housing, while Spencer Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Spencer Park, while Collingwood Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons