Collingwood Heights vs Spencer Park, WA Suburb Comparison

Collingwood Heights for families; Spencer Park for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Collingwood HeightsSpencer Park

Overall score

Collingwood Heights

44.2/100

Spencer Park

55.0/100

Crime rate

Collingwood Heights

51.5 / 1k

Spencer Park

51.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Collingwood Heights

9

Spencer Park

34

Population

Collingwood Heights

694

Spencer Park

3,445

Metric leadCollingwood Heights 1Spencer Park 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCollingwood HeightsSpencer Park
Overall score44.2/10055.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.0/10067.6/100
Crime rate51.5 / 1k51.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops513
Walkability7.5/10063.5/100
Nearby amenities934
Green cover0.9%7.2%
Population6943,445
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Collingwood Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Spencer Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Collingwood Heights tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Spencer Park stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.

Retirees may find Collingwood Heights the better fit, while families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Spencer Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons