Overall score
Collingwood Heights
32.0/100
Spencer Park
56.1/100
Collingwood Heights for retirees; Spencer Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Collingwood Heights
32.0/100
Spencer Park
56.1/100
Crime rate
Collingwood Heights
4816.7 / 1k
Spencer Park
970.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Collingwood Heights
3
Spencer Park
21
Population
Collingwood Heights
694
Spencer Park
3,445
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Collingwood Heights | Spencer Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.0/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.1/100 | 49.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 4816.7 / 1k | 970.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 13 |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 21 |
| Population | 694 | 3,445 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Collingwood Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Spencer Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Collingwood Heights tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Spencer Park stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Collingwood Heights generally means more sought-after housing, while Spencer Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Spencer Park, while Collingwood Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.