Overall score
Collingwood Heights
32.0/100
Lower King
33.4/100
Collingwood Heights for families and schools; Lower King for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Collingwood Heights
32.0/100
Lower King
33.4/100
Crime rate
Collingwood Heights
4816.7 / 1k
Lower King
1736.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Collingwood Heights
3
Lower King
9
Population
Collingwood Heights
694
Lower King
1,890
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Collingwood Heights | Lower King |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.0/100 | 33.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.1/100 | 49.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 4816.7 / 1k | 1736.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 14 |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 9 |
| Population | 694 | 1,890 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Collingwood Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Lower King is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Lower King keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Collingwood Heights tends to lead on a country-town feel and improving crime trends, while Lower King stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Lower King, while Collingwood Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.