Collingwood Heights vs Lower King, WA Suburb Comparison

Collingwood Heights for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Collingwood HeightsLower King

Overall score

Collingwood Heights

44.2/100

Lower King

38.0/100

Crime rate

Collingwood Heights

50.0 / 1k

Lower King

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Collingwood Heights

9

Lower King

12

Population

Collingwood Heights

694

Lower King

1,890

Metric leadCollingwood Heights 2Lower King 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCollingwood HeightsLower King
Overall score44.2/10038.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.0/10049.9/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools3—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops514
Walkability7.5/10021.0/100
Nearby amenities912
Green cover0.9%0.5%
Population6941,890
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/106/10

Comparison summary

Collingwood Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Lower King is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Lower King keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Collingwood Heights tends to lead on a country-town feel and an emerging neighbourhood, while Lower King stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose Collingwood Heights if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Lower King for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons