Collingwood Heights vs Lower King, WA suburb comparison

Collingwood Heights for families and schools; Lower King for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Collingwood HeightsLower King

Overall score

Collingwood Heights

32.0/100

Lower King

33.4/100

Crime rate

Collingwood Heights

4816.7 / 1k

Lower King

1736.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Collingwood Heights

3

Lower King

9

Population

Collingwood Heights

694

Lower King

1,890

Metric leadCollingwood Heights 0Lower King 8across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCollingwood HeightsLower King
Overall score32.0/10033.4/100
Housing (desirability)37.1/10049.2/100
Crime rate4816.7 / 1k1736.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools3
Public transport stops514
Walkability7.5/10021.0/100
Nearby amenities39
Population6941,890
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/106/10

Comparison summary

Collingwood Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Lower King is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Lower King keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Collingwood Heights tends to lead on a country-town feel and improving crime trends, while Lower King stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Lower King, while Collingwood Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons

Collingwood Heights vs Lower King, WA… | Suburb Guide