Overall score
Emu Point
30.1/100
Lower King
33.4/100
Emu Point vs Lower King, WA suburb comparison
Emu Point for schools; Lower King for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Emu PointLower King
Crime rate
Emu Point
11970.3 / 1k
Lower King
1736.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Emu Point
37
Lower King
9
Population
Emu Point
285
Lower King
1,890
Metric leadEmu Point 1Lower King 7across 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLower King
- Best for investmentLower King
- Best for best valueLower King
- Best for best schoolsEmu Point
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Emu Point | Lower King |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.1/100 | 33.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 2.6/100 | 49.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 11970.3 / 1k | 1736.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 14 |
| Walkability | 8.5/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 37 | 9 |
| Population | 285 | 1,890 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Emu Point is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Lower King is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Emu Point tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, while Lower King stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Lower King, while Emu Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.