Emu Point vs Lower King, WA Suburb Comparison

Emu Point for retirees and families; Lower King for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Emu PointLower King

Overall score

Emu Point

56.4/100

Lower King

38.0/100

Crime rate

Emu Point

50.0 / 1k

Lower King

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Emu Point

56

Lower King

12

Population

Emu Point

285

Lower King

1,890

Metric leadEmu Point 3Lower King 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEmu PointLower King
Overall score56.4/10038.0/100
Housing (desirability)44.2/10049.9/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops314
Walkability8.5/10021.0/100
Nearby amenities5612
Green cover26.0%0.5%
Population2851,890
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Emu Point is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Lower King is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Emu Point tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, while Lower King stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Households prioritising schools may find Emu Point the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Lower King.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons