Overall score
Bayonet Head
40.9/100
Lower King
33.4/100
Bayonet Head vs Lower King, WA suburb comparison
Bayonet Head for investment and value; Lower King for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Bayonet HeadLower King
Crime rate
Bayonet Head
998.3 / 1k
Lower King
1736.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bayonet Head
8
Lower King
9
Population
Bayonet Head
3,272
Lower King
1,890
Metric leadBayonet Head 6Lower King 2across 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLower King
- Best for familiesLower King
- Best for investmentBayonet Head
- Best for best valueBayonet Head
- Best for best schoolsLower King
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bayonet Head | Lower King |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.9/100 | 33.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.0/100 | 49.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 998.3 / 1k | 1736.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 14 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 8 | 9 |
| Population | 3,272 | 1,890 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Bayonet Head reads as a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe; Lower King is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Bayonet Head pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Lower King is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Bayonet Head sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Lower King.
Bayonet Head suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Lower King is the stronger match for retirees and families.