Bayonet Head vs Collingwood Heights, WA Suburb Comparison

Bayonet Head for retirees and value; Collingwood Heights for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bayonet HeadCollingwood Heights

Overall score

Bayonet Head

43.6/100

Collingwood Heights

44.2/100

Crime rate

Bayonet Head

50.0 / 1k

Collingwood Heights

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bayonet Head

17

Collingwood Heights

9

Population

Bayonet Head

3,272

Collingwood Heights

694

Metric leadBayonet Head 6Collingwood Heights 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBayonet HeadCollingwood Heights
Overall score43.6/10044.2/100
Housing (desirability)57.8/10049.0/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops255
Walkability30.0/1007.5/100
Nearby amenities179
Green cover25.1%0.9%
Population3,272694
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bayonet Head is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Collingwood Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Bayonet Head keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Bayonet Head is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability; Collingwood Heights answers with schools and education options, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Bayonet Head the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Collingwood Heights.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons