Bayonet Head vs Collingwood Heights, WA suburb comparison

Bayonet Head for investment and value; Collingwood Heights for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bayonet HeadCollingwood Heights

Overall score

Bayonet Head

40.9/100

Collingwood Heights

32.0/100

Crime rate

Bayonet Head

998.3 / 1k

Collingwood Heights

4816.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bayonet Head

8

Collingwood Heights

3

Population

Bayonet Head

3,272

Collingwood Heights

694

Metric leadBayonet Head 7Collingwood Heights 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBayonet HeadCollingwood Heights
Overall score40.9/10032.0/100
Housing (desirability)62.0/10037.1/100
Crime rate998.3 / 1k4816.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Public transport stops255
Walkability30.0/1007.5/100
Nearby amenities83
Population3,272694
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bayonet Head is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Collingwood Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Bayonet Head keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Bayonet Head is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Collingwood Heights answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Bayonet Head sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Collingwood Heights.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Bayonet Head the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Collingwood Heights.

Related comparisons