Overall score
Collingwood Heights
32.0/100
Lange
30.4/100
Collingwood Heights for retirees and families; Lange for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Collingwood Heights
32.0/100
Lange
30.4/100
Crime rate
Collingwood Heights
4816.7 / 1k
Lange
8474.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Collingwood Heights
3
Lange
0
Population
Collingwood Heights
694
Lange
394
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Collingwood Heights | Lange |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.0/100 | 30.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.1/100 | 52.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 4816.7 / 1k | 8474.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 4 |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 0 |
| Population | 694 | 394 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Collingwood Heights reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Lange is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Collingwood Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Lange keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Collingwood Heights tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Lange stands out for housing affordability and overall desirability.
Retirees may find Collingwood Heights the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Lange.