Emu Point vs Spencer Park, WA suburb comparison

Spencer Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Emu PointSpencer Park

Overall score

Emu Point

30.1/100

Spencer Park

56.1/100

Crime rate

Emu Point

11970.3 / 1k

Spencer Park

970.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Emu Point

37

Spencer Park

21

Population

Emu Point

285

Spencer Park

3,445

Metric leadEmu Point 2Spencer Park 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEmu PointSpencer Park
Overall score30.1/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)2.6/10049.2/100
Crime rate11970.3 / 1k970.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Public transport stops313
Walkability8.5/10063.5/100
Nearby amenities3721
Population2853,445
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Emu Point is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Emu Point tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Spencer Park stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Emu Point sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Spencer Park.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Spencer Park, while Emu Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons