Overall score
Emu Point
30.1/100
Spencer Park
56.1/100
Spencer Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Emu Point
30.1/100
Spencer Park
56.1/100
Crime rate
Emu Point
11970.3 / 1k
Spencer Park
970.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Emu Point
37
Spencer Park
21
Population
Emu Point
285
Spencer Park
3,445
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Emu Point | Spencer Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.1/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 2.6/100 | 49.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 11970.3 / 1k | 970.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 13 |
| Walkability | 8.5/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 37 | 21 |
| Population | 285 | 3,445 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Emu Point is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Emu Point tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Spencer Park stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Emu Point sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Spencer Park.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Spencer Park, while Emu Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.