Emu Point vs Spencer Park, WA Suburb Comparison

Emu Point for retirees and families; Spencer Park for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Emu PointSpencer Park

Overall score

Emu Point

56.4/100

Spencer Park

55.0/100

Crime rate

Emu Point

50.0 / 1k

Spencer Park

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Emu Point

56

Spencer Park

34

Population

Emu Point

285

Spencer Park

3,445

Metric leadEmu Point 4Spencer Park 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEmu PointSpencer Park
Overall score56.4/10055.0/100
Housing (desirability)44.2/10067.6/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops313
Walkability8.5/10063.5/100
Nearby amenities5634
Green cover26.0%7.2%
Population2853,445
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Emu Point is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Emu Point tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Spencer Park stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Spencer Park, while Emu Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons