Overall score
Emu Point
56.4/100
Spencer Park
55.0/100
Emu Point for retirees and families; Spencer Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Emu Point
56.4/100
Spencer Park
55.0/100
Crime rate
Emu Point
50.0 / 1k
Spencer Park
50.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Emu Point
56
Spencer Park
34
Population
Emu Point
285
Spencer Park
3,445
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Emu Point | Spencer Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.4/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.2/100 | 67.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.0 / 1k | 50.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 13 |
| Walkability | 8.5/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 56 | 34 |
| Green cover | 26.0% | 7.2% |
| Population | 285 | 3,445 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Emu Point is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Emu Point tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Spencer Park stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Spencer Park, while Emu Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.