Albany vs Spencer Park, WA suburb comparison

Albany for retirees; Spencer Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AlbanySpencer Park

Overall score

Albany

52.0/100

Spencer Park

56.1/100

Crime rate

Albany

2387.8 / 1k

Spencer Park

970.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Albany

204

Spencer Park

21

Population

Albany

1,403

Spencer Park

3,445

Metric leadAlbany 3Spencer Park 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAlbanySpencer Park
Overall score52.0/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)14.7/10049.2/100
Crime rate2387.8 / 1k970.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools26
Parks & reserves4
Public transport stops1313
Walkability89.5/10063.5/100
Nearby amenities20421
Population1,4033,445
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/102/10

Comparison summary

Albany is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Albany pulls ahead on schools and education options and walkability, whereas Spencer Park is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Albany generally means more sought-after housing, while Spencer Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Albany suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Spencer Park is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons