Albany vs Spencer Park, WA Suburb Comparison

Albany for retirees and families; Spencer Park for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AlbanySpencer Park

Overall score

Albany

63.8/100

Spencer Park

55.0/100

Crime rate

Albany

50.0 / 1k

Spencer Park

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Albany

276

Spencer Park

34

Population

Albany

1,403

Spencer Park

3,445

Metric leadAlbany 4Spencer Park 43 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAlbanySpencer Park
Overall score63.8/10055.0/100
Housing (desirability)50.3/10067.6/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools26
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves4—
Public transport stops1313
Walkability89.5/10063.5/100
Nearby amenities27634
Green cover5.2%7.2%
Population1,4033,445
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/102/10

Comparison summary

Albany is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Albany pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Spencer Park is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and overall desirability.

Albany suits retirees more clearly, whereas Spencer Park is the stronger match for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons