Overall score
Albany
52.0/100
Spencer Park
56.1/100
Albany for retirees; Spencer Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Albany
52.0/100
Spencer Park
56.1/100
Crime rate
Albany
2387.8 / 1k
Spencer Park
970.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Albany
204
Spencer Park
21
Population
Albany
1,403
Spencer Park
3,445
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Albany | Spencer Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.0/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 14.7/100 | 49.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 2387.8 / 1k | 970.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | — |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 13 |
| Walkability | 89.5/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 204 | 21 |
| Population | 1,403 | 3,445 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 2/10 |
Albany is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Albany pulls ahead on schools and education options and walkability, whereas Spencer Park is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Albany generally means more sought-after housing, while Spencer Park leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Albany suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Spencer Park is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.