Chelmer vs Sherwood, QLD suburb comparison

Chelmer for retirees and investment; Sherwood for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChelmerSherwood

Overall score

Chelmer

53.9/100

Sherwood

58.1/100

Crime rate

Chelmer

40.6 / 1k

Sherwood

34.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chelmer

35

Sherwood

143

Population

Chelmer

3,325

Sherwood

6,082

Metric leadChelmer 2Sherwood 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChelmerSherwood
Overall score53.9/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10030.2/100
Crime rate40.6 / 1k34.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1110
Parks & reserves44
Public transport stops1122
Walkability18.5/10073.0/100
Nearby amenities35143
Population3,3256,082
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chelmer is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, and Sherwood is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Chelmer pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Sherwood is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Choose Chelmer if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Sherwood for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons