Chelmer vs Fig Tree Pocket, QLD Suburb Comparison

Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChelmerFig Tree Pocket

Overall score

Chelmer

49.7/100

Fig Tree Pocket

63.0/100

Crime rate

Chelmer

65.0 / 1k

Fig Tree Pocket

14.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chelmer

40

Fig Tree Pocket

155

Population

Chelmer

3,325

Fig Tree Pocket

4,345

Metric leadChelmer 2Fig Tree Pocket 82 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChelmerFig Tree Pocket
Overall score49.7/10063.0/100
Housing (desirability)45.5/10044.9/100
Crime rate65.0 / 1k14.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools115
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves48
Public transport stops1125
Walkability18.5/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities40155
Green cover4.5%13.3%
Population3,3254,345
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chelmer is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Chelmer is stronger for schools and education options; Fig Tree Pocket answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Fig Tree Pocket, while Chelmer remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons