Overall score
Chelmer
53.9/100
Fig Tree Pocket
65.5/100
Chelmer vs Fig Tree Pocket, QLD suburb comparison
Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChelmerFig Tree Pocket
Crime rate
Chelmer
40.6 / 1k
Fig Tree Pocket
9.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chelmer
35
Fig Tree Pocket
149
Population
Chelmer
3,325
Fig Tree Pocket
4,345
Metric leadChelmer 1Fig Tree Pocket 72 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesFig Tree Pocket
- Best for familiesFig Tree Pocket
- Best for best valueFig Tree Pocket
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chelmer | Fig Tree Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.9/100 | 65.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.6 / 1k | 9.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 11 | 25 |
| Walkability | 18.5/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 35 | 149 |
| Population | 3,325 | 4,345 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Chelmer is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, while Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Chelmer is stronger for an affluent, sought-after address and good access to parks; Fig Tree Pocket answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Fig Tree Pocket, while Chelmer remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.