Overall score
Chelmer
49.7/100
Fig Tree Pocket
63.0/100
Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chelmer
49.7/100
Fig Tree Pocket
63.0/100
Crime rate
Chelmer
65.0 / 1k
Fig Tree Pocket
14.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chelmer
40
Fig Tree Pocket
155
Population
Chelmer
3,325
Fig Tree Pocket
4,345
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chelmer | Fig Tree Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.7/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.5/100 | 44.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 65.0 / 1k | 14.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 11 | 25 |
| Walkability | 18.5/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 40 | 155 |
| Green cover | 4.5% | 13.3% |
| Population | 3,325 | 4,345 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Chelmer is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Chelmer is stronger for schools and education options; Fig Tree Pocket answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Fig Tree Pocket, while Chelmer remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.