Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
65.5/100
Graceville
72.4/100
Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families; Graceville for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
65.5/100
Graceville
72.4/100
Crime rate
Fig Tree Pocket
9.3 / 1k
Graceville
34.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fig Tree Pocket
149
Graceville
144
Population
Fig Tree Pocket
4,345
Graceville
4,764
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fig Tree Pocket | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.5/100 | 72.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.3 / 1k | 34.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 28 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 92.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 149 | 144 |
| Population | 4,345 | 4,764 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Graceville is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Fig Tree Pocket is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Graceville answers with public transport access and walkability.
Choose Fig Tree Pocket if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Graceville for households prioritising schools.