Fig Tree Pocket vs Graceville, QLD Suburb Comparison

Fig Tree Pocket for investment; Graceville for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Fig Tree PocketGraceville

Overall score

Fig Tree Pocket

63.0/100

Graceville

69.3/100

Crime rate

Fig Tree Pocket

14.7 / 1k

Graceville

56.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fig Tree Pocket

155

Graceville

148

Population

Fig Tree Pocket

4,345

Graceville

4,764

Metric leadFig Tree Pocket 3Graceville 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFig Tree PocketGraceville
Overall score63.0/10069.3/100
Housing (desirability)44.9/10054.1/100
Crime rate14.7 / 1k56.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools59
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves86
Public transport stops2528
Walkability34.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities155148
Green cover13.3%17.9%
Population4,3454,764
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Graceville is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Fig Tree Pocket is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities; Graceville answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose Fig Tree Pocket if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Graceville for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons