Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
63.0/100
Graceville
69.3/100
Fig Tree Pocket for investment; Graceville for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
63.0/100
Graceville
69.3/100
Crime rate
Fig Tree Pocket
14.7 / 1k
Graceville
56.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fig Tree Pocket
155
Graceville
148
Population
Fig Tree Pocket
4,345
Graceville
4,764
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fig Tree Pocket | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.0/100 | 69.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.9/100 | 54.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 14.7 / 1k | 56.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 28 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 155 | 148 |
| Green cover | 13.3% | 17.9% |
| Population | 4,345 | 4,764 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Graceville is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Fig Tree Pocket is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities; Graceville answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.
Choose Fig Tree Pocket if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Graceville for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.