Fig Tree Pocket vs Graceville, QLD suburb comparison

Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families; Graceville for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Fig Tree PocketGraceville

Overall score

Fig Tree Pocket

65.5/100

Graceville

72.4/100

Crime rate

Fig Tree Pocket

9.3 / 1k

Graceville

34.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fig Tree Pocket

149

Graceville

144

Population

Fig Tree Pocket

4,345

Graceville

4,764

Metric leadFig Tree Pocket 3Graceville 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFig Tree PocketGraceville
Overall score65.5/10072.4/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate9.3 / 1k34.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools59
Parks & reserves86
Public transport stops2528
Walkability34.0/10092.0/100
Nearby amenities149144
Population4,3454,764
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Graceville is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Fig Tree Pocket is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Graceville answers with public transport access and walkability.

Choose Fig Tree Pocket if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Graceville for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons