Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
65.9/100
Sinnamon Park
58.5/100
Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
65.9/100
Sinnamon Park
58.5/100
Crime rate
Fig Tree Pocket
9.3 / 1k
Sinnamon Park
28.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fig Tree Pocket
149
Sinnamon Park
119
Population
Fig Tree Pocket
4,345
Sinnamon Park
6,590
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fig Tree Pocket | Sinnamon Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.9/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 47.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.3 / 1k | 28.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 38 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 149 | 119 |
| Population | 4,345 | 6,590 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Sinnamon Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Fig Tree Pocket sits closer to the city centre, whereas Sinnamon Park is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Fig Tree Pocket is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Sinnamon Park answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.
Choose Fig Tree Pocket if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Sinnamon Park for households prioritising schools.