Fig Tree Pocket vs Sinnamon Park, QLD suburb comparison

Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Fig Tree PocketSinnamon Park

Overall score

Fig Tree Pocket

65.9/100

Sinnamon Park

58.5/100

Crime rate

Fig Tree Pocket

9.3 / 1k

Sinnamon Park

28.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fig Tree Pocket

149

Sinnamon Park

119

Population

Fig Tree Pocket

4,345

Sinnamon Park

6,590

Metric leadFig Tree Pocket 5Sinnamon Park 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFig Tree PocketSinnamon Park
Overall score65.9/10058.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10047.6/100
Crime rate9.3 / 1k28.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Parks & reserves811
Public transport stops2538
Walkability34.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities149119
Population4,3456,590
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Sinnamon Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Fig Tree Pocket sits closer to the city centre, whereas Sinnamon Park is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Fig Tree Pocket is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Sinnamon Park answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.

Choose Fig Tree Pocket if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Sinnamon Park for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons