Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
65.5/100
Kenmore
85.7/100
Fig Tree Pocket vs Kenmore, QLD suburb comparison
Kenmore for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Fig Tree PocketKenmore
Crime rate
Fig Tree Pocket
9.3 / 1k
Kenmore
9.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fig Tree Pocket
149
Kenmore
376
Population
Fig Tree Pocket
4,345
Kenmore
9,675
Metric leadFig Tree Pocket 0Kenmore 82 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fig Tree Pocket | Kenmore |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.5/100 | 85.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.3 / 1k | 9.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 19 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 57 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 149 | 376 |
| Population | 4,345 | 9,675 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Kenmore is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Fig Tree Pocket sits closer to the city centre, whereas Kenmore is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Fig Tree Pocket is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Kenmore answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kenmore, while Fig Tree Pocket remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.