Fig Tree Pocket vs Seventeen Mile Rocks, QLD suburb comparison

Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Fig Tree PocketSeventeen Mile Rocks

Overall score

Fig Tree Pocket

65.5/100

Seventeen Mile Rocks

51.8/100

Crime rate

Fig Tree Pocket

9.3 / 1k

Seventeen Mile Rocks

27.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fig Tree Pocket

149

Seventeen Mile Rocks

154

Population

Fig Tree Pocket

4,345

Seventeen Mile Rocks

2,699

Metric leadFig Tree Pocket 7Seventeen Mile Rocks 12 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFig Tree PocketSeventeen Mile Rocks
Overall score65.5/10051.8/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate9.3 / 1k27.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Parks & reserves85
Public transport stops259
Walkability34.0/10015.5/100
Nearby amenities149154
Population4,3452,699
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Seventeen Mile Rocks is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Fig Tree Pocket sits closer to the city centre, whereas Seventeen Mile Rocks is in a middle-ring position.

Fig Tree Pocket pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Seventeen Mile Rocks is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Fig Tree Pocket, while Seventeen Mile Rocks remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons