Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
65.5/100
Seventeen Mile Rocks
51.8/100
Fig Tree Pocket for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fig Tree Pocket
65.5/100
Seventeen Mile Rocks
51.8/100
Crime rate
Fig Tree Pocket
9.3 / 1k
Seventeen Mile Rocks
27.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fig Tree Pocket
149
Seventeen Mile Rocks
154
Population
Fig Tree Pocket
4,345
Seventeen Mile Rocks
2,699
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fig Tree Pocket | Seventeen Mile Rocks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.5/100 | 51.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.3 / 1k | 27.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 9 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 15.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 149 | 154 |
| Population | 4,345 | 2,699 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Fig Tree Pocket is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Seventeen Mile Rocks is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Fig Tree Pocket sits closer to the city centre, whereas Seventeen Mile Rocks is in a middle-ring position.
Fig Tree Pocket pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Seventeen Mile Rocks is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Fig Tree Pocket, while Seventeen Mile Rocks remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.