Darra vs Seventeen Mile Rocks, QLD Suburb Comparison

Darra for investment; Seventeen Mile Rocks for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DarraSeventeen Mile Rocks

Overall score

Darra

43.2/100

Seventeen Mile Rocks

59.6/100

Crime rate

Darra

162.1 / 1k

Seventeen Mile Rocks

41.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Darra

119

Seventeen Mile Rocks

160

Population

Darra

4,098

Seventeen Mile Rocks

2,699

Metric leadDarra 4Seventeen Mile Rocks 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarraSeventeen Mile Rocks
Overall score43.2/10059.6/100
Housing (desirability)42.8/10053.2/100
Crime rate162.1 / 1k41.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves85
Public transport stops329
Walkability57.0/10015.5/100
Nearby amenities119160
Green cover8.0%29.0%
Population4,0982,699
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/1010/10

Comparison summary

Darra is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Seventeen Mile Rocks is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Darra tends to lead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, while Seventeen Mile Rocks stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities. Darra generally means more approachable housing costs, while Seventeen Mile Rocks leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Seventeen Mile Rocks, while Darra remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons