Darra vs Jamboree Heights, QLD Suburb Comparison

Jamboree Heights for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DarraJamboree Heights

Overall score

Darra

43.2/100

Jamboree Heights

48.0/100

Crime rate

Darra

162.1 / 1k

Jamboree Heights

47.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Darra

119

Jamboree Heights

32

Population

Darra

4,098

Jamboree Heights

3,141

Metric leadDarra 6Jamboree Heights 51 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarraJamboree Heights
Overall score43.2/10048.0/100
Housing (desirability)42.8/10058.5/100
Crime rate162.1 / 1k47.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves82
Public transport stops328
Walkability57.0/10016.0/100
Nearby amenities11932
Green cover8.0%4.3%
Population4,0983,141
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Darra reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Jamboree Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Jamboree Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Darra keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Darra is stronger for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability; Jamboree Heights answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. Darra generally means more approachable housing costs, while Jamboree Heights leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Jamboree Heights, while Darra remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons