Jamboree Heights vs Seventeen Mile Rocks, QLD Suburb Comparison

Jamboree Heights for investment; Seventeen Mile Rocks for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Jamboree HeightsSeventeen Mile Rocks

Overall score

Jamboree Heights

48.0/100

Seventeen Mile Rocks

59.6/100

Crime rate

Jamboree Heights

47.9 / 1k

Seventeen Mile Rocks

41.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jamboree Heights

32

Seventeen Mile Rocks

160

Population

Jamboree Heights

3,141

Seventeen Mile Rocks

2,699

Metric leadJamboree Heights 4Seventeen Mile Rocks 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJamboree HeightsSeventeen Mile Rocks
Overall score48.0/10059.6/100
Housing (desirability)58.5/10053.2/100
Crime rate47.9 / 1k41.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools42
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves25
Public transport stops89
Walkability16.0/10015.5/100
Nearby amenities32160
Green cover4.3%29.0%
Population3,1412,699
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Jamboree Heights reads as a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood; Seventeen Mile Rocks is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Jamboree Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Seventeen Mile Rocks keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Jamboree Heights is stronger for schools and education options, walkability, and a larger local community; Seventeen Mile Rocks answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Jamboree Heights the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Seventeen Mile Rocks.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons