Overall score
Corinda
63.6/100
Graceville
69.3/100
Corinda vs Graceville, QLD Suburb Comparison
Corinda for investment; Graceville for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CorindaGraceville
Crime rate
Corinda
56.4 / 1k
Graceville
56.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Corinda
116
Graceville
148
Population
Corinda
5,555
Graceville
4,764
Metric leadCorinda 5Graceville 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesGraceville
- Best for familiesGraceville
- Best for investmentCorinda
- Best for best schoolsGraceville
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Corinda | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.6/100 | 69.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.2/100 | 54.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 56.4 / 1k | 56.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 16 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 28 |
| Walkability | 74.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 116 | 148 |
| Green cover | 18.2% | 17.9% |
| Population | 5,555 | 4,764 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Corinda reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Graceville is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Corinda tends to lead on parks and reserves, plus a larger local community, while Graceville stands out for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.
On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Graceville, while Corinda remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.