Cheltenham vs Pennant Hills, NSW suburb comparison

Cheltenham for retirees and families; Pennant Hills for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CheltenhamPennant Hills

Overall score

Cheltenham

53.2/100

Pennant Hills

68.5/100

Crime rate

Cheltenham

13.8 / 1k

Pennant Hills

23.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cheltenham

169

Pennant Hills

390

Population

Cheltenham

2,166

Pennant Hills

7,588

Metric leadCheltenham 4Pennant Hills 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCheltenhamPennant Hills
Overall score53.2/10068.5/100
Housing (desirability)38.1/10029.4/100
Crime rate13.8 / 1k23.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools97
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops2983
Walkability30.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities169390
Planning activity1126
Population2,1667,588
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Cheltenham is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Pennant Hills is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Pennant Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Cheltenham keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Cheltenham tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Pennant Hills stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access.

Investors may find Cheltenham the better fit, while value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pennant Hills.

Related comparisons