Chermside vs Wavell Heights, QLD Suburb Comparison

Chermside for retirees; Wavell Heights for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChermsideWavell Heights

Overall score

Chermside

54.9/100

Wavell Heights

56.2/100

Crime rate

Chermside

174.1 / 1k

Wavell Heights

51.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chermside

587

Wavell Heights

210

Population

Chermside

11,426

Wavell Heights

10,336

Metric leadChermside 5Wavell Heights 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChermsideWavell Heights
Overall score54.9/10056.2/100
Housing (desirability)63.5/10062.5/100
Crime rate174.1 / 1k51.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools99
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves816
Public transport stops7274
Walkability100.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities587210
Green cover23.8%15.7%
Population11,42610,336
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chermside is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Wavell Heights is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Wavell Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Chermside keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Chermside tends to lead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, while Wavell Heights stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wavell Heights, while Chermside remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons