Chermside vs Stafford Heights, QLD Suburb Comparison

Chermside for retirees; Stafford Heights for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChermsideStafford Heights

Overall score

Chermside

54.9/100

Stafford Heights

58.4/100

Crime rate

Chermside

174.1 / 1k

Stafford Heights

60.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chermside

587

Stafford Heights

125

Population

Chermside

11,426

Stafford Heights

6,992

Metric leadChermside 5Stafford Heights 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChermsideStafford Heights
Overall score54.9/10058.4/100
Housing (desirability)63.5/10065.8/100
Crime rate174.1 / 1k60.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools99
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves89
Public transport stops7234
Walkability100.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities587125
Green cover23.8%7.1%
Population11,4266,992
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chermside is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Stafford Heights is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Stafford Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Chermside keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Chermside pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Stafford Heights is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Stafford Heights, while Chermside remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons