McDowall vs Stafford Heights, QLD suburb comparison

McDowall for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

McDowallStafford Heights

Overall score

McDowall

63.8/100

Stafford Heights

66.1/100

Crime rate

McDowall

37.1 / 1k

Stafford Heights

37.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

McDowall

209

Stafford Heights

123

Population

McDowall

7,612

Stafford Heights

6,992

Metric leadMcDowall 4Stafford Heights 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMcDowallStafford Heights
Overall score63.8/10066.1/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate37.1 / 1k37.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools49
Parks & reserves149
Public transport stops2134
Walkability57.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities209123
Population7,6126,992
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

McDowall is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Stafford Heights is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Stafford Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while McDowall keeps a flatter suburban layout.

McDowall tends to lead on parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities, while Stafford Heights stands out for schools and education options and public transport access.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer McDowall, while Stafford Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons