Overall score
Bridgeman Downs
55.7/100
McDowall
63.8/100
Bridgeman Downs vs McDowall, QLD suburb comparison
McDowall for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Bridgeman DownsMcDowall
Crime rate
Bridgeman Downs
10.6 / 1k
McDowall
37.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bridgeman Downs
110
McDowall
209
Population
Bridgeman Downs
10,938
McDowall
7,612
Metric leadBridgeman Downs 3McDowall 42 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bridgeman Downs | McDowall |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.7/100 | 63.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 10.6 / 1k | 37.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 21 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 110 | 209 |
| Population | 10,938 | 7,612 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Bridgeman Downs is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while McDowall is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Bridgeman Downs sits among greener hillside streets, while McDowall keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Bridgeman Downs is stronger for a quieter safety profile and public transport access; McDowall answers with parks and reserves and walkability.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer McDowall, while Bridgeman Downs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.