Bridgeman Downs vs Fitzgibbon, QLD suburb comparison

Bridgeman Downs for retirees; Fitzgibbon for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bridgeman DownsFitzgibbon

Overall score

Bridgeman Downs

55.7/100

Fitzgibbon

58.4/100

Crime rate

Bridgeman Downs

10.6 / 1k

Fitzgibbon

24.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bridgeman Downs

110

Fitzgibbon

141

Population

Bridgeman Downs

10,938

Fitzgibbon

6,296

Metric leadBridgeman Downs 4Fitzgibbon 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBridgeman DownsFitzgibbon
Overall score55.7/10058.4/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate10.6 / 1k24.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools6
Parks & reserves88
Public transport stops2217
Walkability30.0/10033.5/100
Nearby amenities110141
Population10,9386,296
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bridgeman Downs is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Fitzgibbon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Bridgeman Downs sits among greener hillside streets, while Fitzgibbon keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bridgeman Downs tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Fitzgibbon stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Bridgeman Downs, while Fitzgibbon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons